Find the record that settles it · Independent financial advisers 1

Send it the email and nothing else

From memory

Fundamentals 10

That is this lesson. Below is an email of the kind that lands the morning after a review. The couple, the firm and Custodian A are invented, and the sender is shown only as spouse A of household HH-01. You are going to send the tool the email and one line of context, that a review meeting happened. No snapshot, no note, no balances, no custodian name. First, a guess.

Guess first

You are about to ask the tool to write a recap of a meeting it was not in. Will it ask you what was decided before it writes?

Yes, it will ask firstNo, it will write the recap anywayNo idea

And how sure are you?

Fairly sureGuessing

Nobody else sees this and nothing here is marked. Being wrong here is worth more than being right.

Paste this in, and nothing else

I am a financial adviser. We held an annual review meeting with this client couple on Tuesday. Write a short follow-up email replying to the message below. Under 150 words, warm, plain language.

The email, as it sits in the inbox. Read it once first.

Subject: quick recap? Hi, thanks for Tuesday. Could you send us a short recap of where we landed on the 401(k) and the mortgage? B wants to see it in writing before we talk to HR about any paperwork. Thanks for everything. A

I sent the email and one line of context. No snapshot, no note, no balances, no custodian name
I noticed whether it asked what was decided, or wrote the recap straight away

A couple has just left their review meeting, and what was decided about a 640,000 401(k) is not in your head. It is in the meeting note and on the household snapshot, and the tool has seen neither. Fifteen minutes on the check that replaces knowing.

Lesson 01 · Where the record lives

By the end you can

Name the record that settles a sentence about a client's money, the rule, or what was said in the room
Reply to a client's recap request after a review meeting without committing the firm to anything the record does not show
Run the Record Check on a draft before it leaves the firm

What you need

Any free consumer plan: ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini. Nothing to upload. The email and the household snapshot you need are on this page, and both are invented.

Independent financial advisers · AI for your trade

Read the reply the way the couple would

Paste its reply here, then tick what is true of it

Check your own work0/4

It says or implies that something was decided about the 401(k): as we agreed, as we discussed, the plan is, you will be rolling
It names a benefit nobody has documented: lower costs, simpler, consolidated, more tax-efficient
It says something about the plan or the portfolio, on track or well positioned, about a plan it has never seen
Nothing in it points to a record. It reads as though the meeting lives inside the tool

If it asked what was decided first, that is the right move and rarer than you would think, and you still have to open the record, because the tool cannot. If it wrote the recap anyway, it wrote about a meeting it was not in, in the same voice it would have used if it had been there. Neither reply is the answer. The answer is in a record the tool does not have.

When a friend asks you at dinner what the RMD age is, you can guess and nobody is harmed. The moment the firm explains a rule or a number to a client in writing, it has undertaken to be accurate and not misleading, and the letter is the exhibit. For an SEC-registered adviser, the Marketing Rule's general prohibitions forbid an untrue statement of material fact and any statement the adviser cannot substantiate on demand (17 CFR 275.206(4)-1, at ecfr.gov), and the Commission's 2019 interpretation of the standard of conduct attaches the duty of care to the advice itself (84 FR 33669). The firm in this track is state-registered, and the Marketing Rule does not reach it directly. The states are converging on it: NASAA adopted amendments to four model rules on 4 May 2026 to align state advertising rules with the SEC rule, and each state adopts on its own timetable. Until yours does, your state's antifraud provisions and NASAA's unethical business practices model rule do the same work. Your state's rule, opened on your regulator's site, controls; if you are SEC-registered, the SEC text controls directly. And the email is a record either way: Rule 204-2(a)(7) requires copies of written communications relating to any recommendation or advice, kept five years, the first two in the office. An AI draft that reaches a client is a record the day it is sent.

Open the snapshot and find the line

Now the record. Below is HH-01's household snapshot, in the format lesson 2 fixes for the whole track. Every line is invented, and nothing on it names or locates the couple. The tool has not seen it. Read the open items line twice.

Household: HH-01 Snapshot: March 2026 People: spouse A 60-64, retiring this year; spouse B 60-64 Accounts: spouse A former-employer 401(k), 640,000 rounded; joint taxable at Custodian A, 210,000 rounded; spouse B Roth IRA at Custodian A, 90,000 rounded Goals, in the client's words as noted: "We want to stop worrying about the market and know the mortgage is gone by 65." Risk profile as documented: moderate (questionnaire February 2026) Plan software output, rounded: 80 percent probability of success; 95,000 annual spending Open items: 1. Rollover decision on the 401(k): leave, roll to IRA at Custodian A, roll to spouse B's plan. No decision. 2. PTE 2020-02 documentation if a rollover is recommended. 3. Mortgage payoff analysis. Last review: March 2026

This is the Record Check. It is what the One-Thing Check becomes when the fact is a client's money, a rule, or what was said in a room you were in and the tool was not. Here is its wording, once, in full. Copy it onto a card and tape it by the screen; every lesson from here on uses it by name.

Record Check: find the one sentence in this draft that would cost the most if it were wrong: a number about the client's money, a statement of the rule, or a claim about what was said. Name the record that settles it: the custodian statement, the plan software output, the note taken in the meeting, the rule text, the current-year IRS page. Open that record and find the line. If you cannot open it, route the sentence to compliance or the custodian instead. Nothing leaves until the line is found, and the record goes in the file.

Run it now. The costliest sentence in the tool's draft is the one about the 401(k): that something was agreed, or that rolling it over will lower costs. The record that settles what was decided is the meeting note, and until lesson 4 hands you the note, the snapshot's open items line is its summary: three options, no decision. The record that settles whether costs would be lower is a fee comparison, and none exists yet. The sentence about being on track has a record too: the planning software's output page, which says 80 percent probability of success. That is a probability, rounded to the nearest five, not a verdict.

I found the open items line and wrote down the three options and the words no decision
I looked for a fee comparison on the snapshot and found none
I wrote the Record Check card: the wording, and the five records it names

Now write the reply to A yourself, with the snapshot open

Check your own work0/5

It says what the record shows: three options for the 401(k) were discussed and no decision was made, and the mortgage payoff analysis is open
It does not say the couple agreed to anything, and it does not say a rollover would lower costs or simplify anything, because no fee comparison exists
It contains no sentence about the plan being on track. If it mentions the plan at all, it says what the output page says, 80 percent probability of success, and when it was run
It commits the firm only to the open items, gives A a date, and tells them nothing needs signing with HR until the fee comparison is in front of them
Nothing in it came from the tool's first reply

Give it the snapshot and watch what it does

Go back to the same chat. This time hand it the snapshot and watch what it does with the open items line and the 80 percent.

Send this in the same chat

Here is the household snapshot. Rewrite the follow-up email to A using only what is on it. Under 150 words, warm, plain language.

The snapshot the tool works from

Household: HH-01. Snapshot: March 2026. People: spouse A 60-64, retiring this year; spouse B 60-64. Accounts: spouse A former-employer 401(k), 640,000 rounded; joint taxable at Custodian A, 210,000 rounded; spouse B Roth IRA at Custodian A, 90,000 rounded. Goals, in the client's words as noted: We want to stop worrying about the market and know the mortgage is gone by 65. Risk profile as documented: moderate (questionnaire February 2026). Plan software output, rounded: 80 percent probability of success; 95,000 annual spending. Open items: 1. Rollover decision on the 401(k): leave, roll to IRA at Custodian A, roll to spouse B's plan. No decision. 2. PTE 2020-02 documentation if a rollover is recommended. 3. Mortgage payoff analysis. Last review: March 2026.

Paste the second reply

Check your own work0/4

Given a line that says no decision, it still wrote as if the couple were leaning, planning, or agreed, or it listed the three options and then favored one
It turned 80 percent probability of success into on track, in good shape, or well positioned
It still did not say who decides, or when the couple will hear from you
The reply I will send is the one I wrote with the snapshot open, not this one

Five things AI never drafts in this firm, on any plan, with any check. One: a performance figure, return, or projection in anything a client or prospect reads. Those come from the custodian's performance report or the plan software, pasted from the record with the record cited. Two: a recommendation the adviser has not made and documented in the meeting note. The tool may restate a documented recommendation; it may not supply one. Three: a testimonial, endorsement, or any sentence in a client's voice. Four: a response to a regulator, an examiner, or a complaint. The tool may build a chronology from the file; the principal and counsel write the response. Five: anything containing client nonpublic personal information on a consumer plan. The tool's first draft today broke items one and two in a single paragraph, and it did so politely.

What may leave the firm today, in three lines. A reply that says what the record shows and commits to the open items. A CRM note that the reply was sent and what it said. Nothing that states a decision, a benefit, or a result that no record holds. That is the shape of the whole track: the tool writes fluently about a meeting it was not in, and just as fluently about the one page you hand it, and neither draft routes the decision to the person who makes it. From here on the check is which record settles it, and whether you have opened it.

My reply to A names the three options and the words no decision, commits only to the open items, and gives a date
The Record Check card, with the wording, the five records and the never list, is by my screen
I can say the Record Check in one breath: the costliest sentence, the record that settles it, the line found or the sentence routed, nothing out until then, the record in the file

Where that leaves you

The tool wrote a recommendation nobody made. Before anything else, you need to know what may go into a consumer tool at all, and the CRM record as it sits is not it. Lesson 2 is the record you read and never paste, the snapshot you type instead, and the privacy rule your registration puts you under.

That was lesson 1 of 30. A free account saves your progress and shows you what the other 29 lessons cover.

Create a free account